Critiquing Internet Sources of Family Relations and Dynamics Essay

On this paper, I willing be critiquing earnings sources of family relations and kinetics via communicates, icons & podcasts. Today, the Internet is equipped to handle an ethe authoritative amount of discipline by elan of blogs, videos, and podcasts. I will question and critique atomic number 53 blog, unitary video, and star podcast, which provide training that, leadresses the number of Family Relations and kinetics for my final question paper. The conversation will start with the information captured on from individu all(prenominal)y cardinal item, and wherefore I will discuss the germs train and prec onceived idea on their position, along with two learned sources. in that respect argon slightly interest kinetics that happen in a family when children enter their teen courses. Some metres as a lift it butt joint be difficult to accept those changes but they argon re in ally only when a advancency of our children beginning to grow up. For instance, when my daughter was jr. she was a daddys girl. If she could natural selection among me and her father, she would fix chosen him manpower d take in. I think she actually had him confined around her little finger. When she began to enter her preteen hop onr years it started to bump a bit. By the time she turned 12 e materiallything shifted from dad to mom. Suddenly our relationship became a lot than important. presently that isnt to say that dad isnt needed.But she is fitting at that age where she knows that I stooge assort to a lot of what she is facing and going through, so she feels that connection with me. When my oldest sonwas junior we were very obturate. He was what close to may advert a mommas boy. He was very dependent on me, however into his middle school years. It wasnt until he hit high school that things began to shift with us (Romero, Stephanie, 2011, Relationship Dynamics) The blog higher up that I precious for my look for on family relationship s and kinetics is a very basal example of the dynamics of a rule family. The reason wherefore I chose to do this is beca make use of the roles of each family is what I wanted to particularise and make clear before starting my paper. In this blog, it mentions how in a family a m early(a) and father be universe chosen by their children through their antithetical stages of the kids bearing. For example, the girl was more(prenominal)(prenominal) than close to the father, from a younger age, then afterwards the age of 12, the girl shifted her attention to a womanish perspective being the m other.Also, the boys were more habituated to hang around with the mother, do them mommas boys, there atomic number 18 many cases like this in a normal family upbringing. The boys then grew up, just like the girl leaned more to their sexuality p atomic number 18nt for help and guidance on their sustenance endeavors. I reckon that there are no biases in this blog being identified, and in all actuality, this blog gives us in inside take of a family, which has kids, which later chose to switch their parent role preference to someone close to their gender akin(predicate)ity. This happens in real(a) families today in our serviceman, because it is just real flavor experiences, and the kids plainly identify themselves with their parents in life stages. The present get word examined whether discrepancies between jejune and parent ratings of family dynamics predict youthful welfare over time. Self-report data from 972 insubstantial-parent dyads stash a mien at two time points separate by one year were analyzed. two adolescents and parents rated a variety of family dynamics (e.g., cohesion), and adolescents inform on their levels of well-being (confidence, purpose in life, and imperative relations with others). Signififannyt discrepancies between adolescents and parents perceptions of family functioning were found for all positive family dynamics, but non for family conflict. Furthermore, discrepancies increased over time and larger discrepancies were noned for senior adolescents. Results from the residualized path model showed that discrepancies were bidirectionally related to adolescent well-being. In addition, age was found to cut hold up the predictive model. Specifically, 14-15 year olds (year 10) were found to be more st open in their well-beingover time than younger adolescents. Also, results picture that well-being is a signifi asstly stronger detrimental predictor of discrepancies over time for the 14-15 year olds (year 10) than the for 10-11 year olds (year 6).The authors suggest that future research would benefit from investigations of the relationship between different perspectives of family constituents and adjustment outcomes of adolescents (Stuart, J., 2012). Draw a pocketcapable racing circuit in the middle of a piece of paper. Draw a indorsement circle around it, and another, and another. Keep desig n larger and larger circles until you cast off 6 circles. In the middle of the smallest circle leave out a smiley demonstrate, which is you. If you think about all the relationships you ready with people, you can label each of the 5 remaining circles. For example the largest faculty absorb the postman, grocery store destroy and the mechanic, while the one closest to you, your spouse. crawfish some time to think of all the people in your life (friends, family, acquaintances), and value them on the circle that feels right for them. erst you are finished step back and take a good attend to. You tycoon find where you have placed mingled people interesting. In case you oasist realized, the people closest to your smiley face are those you naturally wish to be closest with, while each circle outwards represents more distance. The people in the largest circle are comparatively easy, they applyt know your name or anything about you, and because they are at this invulnerable di stance you dont have to worry about them as much. As you progress inwards, the people in each circle come closer to shrewd the real you, which immorals they have the hazard to judge who and what you are, and to hurt you (Greens Release, 2011)Above is a podcasts take on family relations and dynamics, in this podcast it was revealed the functions of having family, friends, acquaintances and other people around you, and how they can happen upon the dynamics of your relationships. The reason why I chose this podcast, as an emphasis in my final research paper is how it demonstrates the righteousness of family and relationship dynamics can affect your inner circle of close people. I apply this podcast on my own egotism and it was as if I was able to look at the full picture of my friends, family, acquaintances, or coworkers. This revelation was astonishing because I was able to see that there are some bad choice of family and friends that I have to keep far from me. The reason why I need tomake these changes is simply that those people closest to me are able to see me naked in other words, as for who I am. The people that are close to me can see my fears, weaknesses, flaws, and more of the things that I hold sacred and personal.The podcast authors ideas are not event to being bias, because the key information in how to mea certainly your family, friends and acquaintances level of closeness to one self is being generalized for allone to use this as a guide. The applicability of this podcast rule of thumb to measuring the dynamics of family and relationships is useful and it can be helpful. During the 50s, the economy was at its highest peak, so families were more functionally specify by the role each family member contributed. In the 50s era, both parents made sure they influenced their children with positivity reinforcement, which allowed for the children to be more receptive to their parents thoughts and respect, because they children at that time had th e ability to experience true parenting.Nowadays, parents are no longer providing their children with 100% attention, imputable to them focusing more on their keepingers than anything else. Parents who are career focused are more prone to sacrifice their families over their careers due(p) to money, but money leads to no real love being giving to their families, which then cause a divorce and family tarring apart. There are also many mavin mothers out there, which have no real manly figures in their boys upbringing, so this can hinder the boy to develop feminine characteristics. In addition, singe parenting can have kids raised in a iodin household looking up to storied rappers, or simple looking for every male they meet as a role model, which can lead to peril (SchoolTube, Inc., 2013).The above video demonstrated that the dynamics of family and relationships are not like they used to be. It mentions how as strong American families that we once were, we are becoming more unvacc inated to breaking apart after careers, family, kids, friends and routine life affect those many households. Now, days, boys are becoming more feminized due not having a father figure when emergence up. When I was growing up, I had my father, mother, blood brother and sister, but my family was never there for one another. I chose to be that person who wanted to part of a family, and help my siblings or parents when needed, but this wasnt the case because the male figure in my family chose the easy representation out. This easy way out was to just let us pretty much be on ourown with no kind words, guidance, emotional connection, I mean my parents house was chaotic. I believe that the video above wasnt biased in any shape or form, because everything that was mentioned in video was pure facts and we can all see how different we as families are evolving into more of a distant household.I believe that this video can relate to millions of families and single parents out there. Unders tanding the dynamics of contemporary, postmodern families and how these relate to health is critically important to nurses and other health care providers throughout the world. Much can be learned by checking not only ones own culture but also other countries. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare family dynamics of families in the fall in States, Finland and Iceland. To date relatively little has been published related to families in these Nordic countries. Six family dimensions in Barnhills Family wellness Cycle served as the hypothetic framework. Adult respondents (n = 567) purposively selected from varied community groups, end the Family Dynamics Measure II (FDM II) and a sociodemographic questionnaire.Main findings from the three countries were positive family dynamics, with interdependence contributing the strongest factor to partially keep up the theoretical propositions in Barnhills Family Health Cycle. Respondents from all countries reported (1) clear confab ulation and flexibility that contribute to mutuality (2) younger age of respondents and increased education that were associated with more positive family dynamics and (3) larger families associated with more prohibit dynamics. Mixed reports occurred according to gender, with Nordic men tending to perceive some negative dimensions.Marriage was important for more positive family dynamics only in the United States. Families in the United States and in Iceland had in common more negative family dynamics during illnesses. Problems and changes affected mostly families in the United States. In general, families in Finland and Iceland had great strengths than in the United States. This benchmark study offers information for health practitioners to assist families, as well as contribute to the returns of family social policies, especially in the United States (White, M. A., Elder, 2010)The influence of web-based information on global citizenship and multicultural understanding is aligne d to the educating the world about ourdifferent cultures, ethnicities, religions, politics, etc. some(prenominal) information is needed vie web-based has revolutionized to a press of a button and keywords, the network has create diversified as we have evolved as humans. The multicultural aspect, now defines our web-based area in ways that scholars continue to study our differences in what has made us become closer each day by the power of the internet.Three factors I believe should be considered when evaluating Internet sources for use in researching information are first, making sure the right keywords are placed in the Google search engine section in order to get the best results. Second, making sure the sources are credible, like can they be proven in a real life experience, scientific data or where researched methods used to analyze source. tercet sources, can be taking into accountancy via video, podcast, and blogs, but how are they relevant to your research topic. And ar e they able to persuade your earreach with source information.I have concluded, that after researching and critiquing internet sources of family relations and dynamics via blogs, videos & podcasts they are all pretty much life experiences. Today, the Internet is equipped to handle an unsubstantial amount of information by way of blogs, videos, and podcasts. After researching and critiquing one blog, one video, and one podcast, the conversation about family relations and dynamics are all pretty similar to one another. The conversations on family relations and dynamics via blog, video and podcast relate to the discussion of real life experiences and amplified understanding of the topic at hand. The authors bias in each social media is based on generalized information, so pulling up credible sources is a unique way to compare researched/scientific data, which can add some credibility to my Final enquiry Paper.ReferencesGreens Release, 2011, Podcast Relationship Dynamics. Retrieved fro m http//greenesrelease.com/portfolio/relationship-dynamics/Ramos, Stephanie, February 10, 2011, Relationship Dynamics Retrieved from http//www.families.com/blog/relationship-dynamicsStuart, J., & Jose, P. E. (2012). The Influence of Discrepancies Between girlish and Parent Ratings of Family Dynamics on the eudaimonia ofAdolescents. journal Of Family Psychology, 26(6), 858-868. doi10.1037/a0030056 SchoolTube, Inc., 2013 Retrieved fromhttp//www.schooltube.com/video/53bad6719111adc1f08f/Family%20Dynamics White, M. A., Elder, J. H., Paavilainen, E., Joronen, K., Helgadttir, H. L., & Seidl, A. (2010). Family dynamics in the United States, Finland and Iceland. Scandinavian Journal Of Caring Sciences, 24(1), 84-93. doi10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00689.x